Your session is going to timeout as a consequence of inactivity. Simply click OK to increase your time and energy for yet another 0 minutes.
They're precisely the same matter, but H4831 sc is Slash shorter so it'll pack into a case a lot easier then the normal, and in some cases like our 7mm rem mag it allows us to add much more powder then just the normal H4831.
The point that the H4831 is indeed a slower burning powder is precisely why you're seeing greater velocities attained with that powder, as opposed to Everything you've observed Together with the IMR stuff. Also very good powder, but rather greater suited to a bit scaled-down scenarios that has a little bit considerably less capability.
Minnesota H4831SC is my head over to from the 7mm Rem Mag, but I am conserving the little I've remaining for slide 2021. I would start out small and do the job your way up, depending on what load data you examine for this combo the min/max loads are all over the board.
INgunner54 said: It has been a bit, but I did get some 4831 SC to try. Found a node and shot some teams.
It is probable that no further dialogue is needed, through which circumstance we propose commencing a completely new thread. If having said that you are feeling your response is necessary it is possible to even now do this.
i've utilized the two and utilized the very same prices and also have not been in a position to tell any noticable differences with performance. the SC Variation meters a little bit smoother is about all. any opinions??
If you've got some heavier .224" bullets, you may look for a load that actually works Okay Using the 4831. The bullets I attempted that were over 70 grains wouldn't stabilize in my rifle, which experienced the regular fourteen" twist. The 70-grain Speer was the largest bullet that could stabilize, however it did that fantastically. It's a funny-looking bullet which has a rounded nose profile, however it shoots good and kills effectively. Deer out to about a hundred and fifty yards al went down immediately with rib-cage hits.
Any load data to aid that? My very first considered is it isn't intending to burn up many of the way and velocities will likely be sluggish and all over the place. May very well be a good fireworks display!
[electronic mail safeguarded] gn and one hundred fifteen CT's, I've killed far more Deer with this combo than all of the rifles I personal blended, Function nearly this although the sweet spot will probably be around 54, I am a Two Little bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat will work rather well for me h4831sc load data if your fascinated
Run your load up with the precise powder (sc or frequent) and large amount you are utilizing though. Same burn level does not imply it can behave "particularly" the exact same. I have observed more than 100 fps distinction between sc and mil-surp numerous H4831.
NBTs or Hornady VMax, but Use a limited provide of Varget, along with a ton a lot more obtainable H4831SC. I shoot fifty five gr. loads h4831 vs h4831sc Nearly solely, mainly because which is exactly what the rifles shoot the very best.
Though IMR 4831 and H4831SC are diverse powders, you will find that in lots of occasions, where one of them is shown one other will probably be at the same time. Also, you will discover there is a fairly constant romantic relationship concerning them in regards to outlined loads.
This looks like a very good spot to disclose a little bit more information on Hodgdon, H4831 precisely...I as soon as experienced a pound of H4831SC sit over the shelf for several yrs. It absolutely was obtained right before Hodgdon began publicizing the "Severe" line h4831sc of powders, of which the H4831s are a component.